Borgata wants card manufacturer to pay USD 10.1M in Ivey case
According to a federal judge, Ivey's actions did not constitute civil fraud. However, the same judge claimed that the actions of the poker legend and his partner had violated state regulations of what constitutes a fair game between the player and the casino.
Then it was ruled that Ivey's attempt to move forward to the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals would have to wait for resolution of a separate lawsuit by Borgata against Gemaco, the playing card manufacturer.
““In the latest twist in the Ivey versus Borgata battle, the casino now wants to force Gemaco to pay the $ 10M that it lost.
”
The filing notes the indisputable fact that the cards were "marked". Borgata further points out that Gemaco well aknowledged this and decided to sell them to Borgata anyway.
If Borgata wins the battle against Gemaco, will the judge order the card manufacturer to pay the casino $10.1m? What does it mean for Ivey?
Massachusetts high court signals skepticism in Kalshi sports contracts case
State attorneys general push for local control over sports prediction markets
Win Systems launches Wigos CMS at Casino City Center Rosario in Argentina
Zitro Digital appoints Thiago Valadão as Commercial Director for Brazil
HIPTHER appoints Elena Stepanyatova to lead event content and production across conference portfolio
CT Interactive expands portfolio, boosts Bulgaria presence in April
William Hill owner Evoke to close 270 shops as losses widen on tax hit
Racing and Sports partners with Altenar to enhance global racing offering
IDX selected to power 250 gaming tables with X-Trend system at the Westside Resort
PokerStars adds Prague and Aix-en-Provence, France to 2026 live schedule
