“We've had conversations with the tribe on all available options,” said Taunton Mayor Tom Hoye, who supports the tribe's casino plan. “They’re continuing to explore all options with the [federal Bureau of Indian Affairs] — and the possibility of a commercial license.”
A shift in strategy toward a commercial bid could help resolve an intractable problem in the development of the state's nascent casino market. Despite the Mashpee tribe's legal struggles, the looming prospect of a tribal casino in the region has made the state’s Gaming Commission reluctant to approve a commercial bid, wary of oversaturating the market.
The state recognized this dilemma from the start, and tried years ago to persuade the Mashpee to seek a commercial license. In crafting the state’s 2011 casino law, lawmakers concluded the market could handle as many as three resort casinos, each in separate regions of the state.
Kathryn Rand, a tribal gambling specialist and a professor at the University of North Dakota School of Law, said a Mashpee commercial bid would raise significant issues. Presumably, the tribe and Genting would have to pay the $85 million state casino licensing fee, which a tribal casino would not have to pay.
“Legally possible, yes,” she said by e-mail. “But even under a highly detailed law like the [Massachusetts casino law], there would still be a number of issues that need resolution — and some of those issues, such as the license fee, may be financial, if not legal, obstacles. Converting a commercial casino to a tribal casino — that, too, would raise numerous issues.”