Proposal for voters to approve of gambling venues

Lawmaker pushes for Nebraska casino legalization  

2014-01-23
Reading time 1:21 min
(US).- Sen. Russ Karpisek of Wilber introduced a proposed constitutional amendment this Tuesday (LR416CA) that would ask voters to approve casino gambling in the state. Under his plan, voters in a city or county in which a casino is proposed would have to approve it.

The Legislature would then set up fees and/or taxes on the casino, of which 50 percent would go to reduce statewide property taxes, 25 percent to public schools, 12 percent to the state Game and Parks Commission, 12 percent to the Department of Natural Resources to help with water projects and 1 percent to fight compulsive gambling.

Karpisek believes casino gambling will raise money for tax relief and state aid to schools, among other things. Nebraska allows keno, horse racing and a lottery but has resisted video gambling machines and casinos. Casino gambling is allowed in the states that surround Nebraska. "We're giving so much of this (gambling) money to other states. Why not save it for ourselves?" Karpisek asked.

There have been recurring efforts through the years to get casino gambling approved.
When voters last weighed in on the issue in 2004, they voted down two proposals to allow it: a ballot measure touted by Las Vegas casino interests and a measure by the Legislature. Supporters still say casino gambling would have been approved had only one measure been on the ballot. The 2004 initiative favored by Las Vegas interests got 47 percent of the vote. The legislative proposal got 36 percent.

In 2003, the Nebraska Supreme Court gutted a petition effort that would have asked voters to approve video slot machines.

Nebraskans for Local Control gathered 178,000 signatures to put the video slots initiative on the ballot, but opponents successfully challenged its constitutionality in court, and it did not go before voters.

The high court said the proposed constitutional amendment was invalid because organizers did not have a sworn statement on file with the secretary of state listing sponsors of the measure, as required by state law.

Leave your comment
Subscribe to our newsletter
Enter your email to receive the latest news
By entering your email address, you agree to Yogonet's Terms of use and Privacy Policies. You understand Yogonet may use your address to send updates and marketing emails. Use the Unsubscribe link in those emails to opt out at any time.
Unsubscribe
EVENTS CALENDAR