he draft contains amendments to the Russian federal laws of organization of gambling and on licensing of certain types of businesses.
One of the bill’s sponsors, Rafil Nugumanov of Tatarstan’s State Council, told the Izvestia daily that he and his colleagues were moved by the fact that people with gambling addiction get into dire straits even when they know they are violating the law by using gambling sites.
At the same time, the lawmakers maintain it is impossible to curb illegal gaming websites without introducing responsibility for their users.
In early 2013, Russia introduced a law restricting the rights and freedoms of people officially recognized as gambling addicts; they would be put under guardianship
The bill also introduces punishment for landlords who allow gaming on premises they rent out. “If owners or sub-renters of real estate fail to take measures to prevent gambling by renters they should be fined up to RU$150,000,” the document reads.
Kirill Grinchenko of the Media Guards project affiliated with the parliamentary majority United Russia party told reporters he thinks the Tatarstan lawmakers’ proposal is redundant.
“We are actively fighting online casinos and other websites that violate Russian laws. About 30pc of all complaints we receive from our citizens are about such websites and access to these sites is usually blocked straight away. When owners launch mirror sites we take care of them as well,” the activist said.
The existing Russian law forbids gambling in the country, including through the internet, with the exception of several areas called special economic zones. The current law allows the state internet watchdog to block gambling sites without a court order, but also permits site owners to contest the decision if they deem it unjust.
Also, in early 2013, Russia introduced a law restricting the rights and freedoms of people officially recognized as gambling addicts; they would be put under guardianship. The guardian would have the responsibility of dispensing that individual’s income, whether it was a salary, pension or other form of income. The individual would still be allowed to carry out minor daily transactions.