International edition
July 25, 2021

New report highlights more positive approach to gaming policy

Rank calls for opportunity to make a greater contribution to life in Britain

(UK).- In its ‘Game Plan’ report, the Rank Group’s CEO, Ian Burke writes: “We believe that the over-arching role of gambling legislation should be to maximise the benefits to society and the economy while minimising costs, rather than simply focusing on harm minimisation.”

B

urke argues that popular myths and misconceptions about gaming have both stymied the growth of the industry and prevented meaningful discussions about how to deal with the subject of problem gambling.

The purpose of ‘Game Plan’ is to identify a different approach to gaming policy and the relationship between industry and government. As such, the report contains three specific reforms:

-Bringing bingo taxation into line with other forms of gaming and betting by setting the rate at 15%;

- Permitting local authorities to choose whether or not to license casinos;

- Allowing licensed casinos greater ability to meet customer demand for gaming machines.

In the report, which has been sent to more than 150 Members of Parliament (amongst others) Burke asserts that Rank and its peers have the potential to “contribute a great deal more to life in Britain through job creation and economic development, revenue generation for government, our work in communities and our capacity to bring people together for shared experiences;” but that greater support from government is required.

He also acknowledges that there is more that the industry should do to create an environment for growth, writing: “We must challenge ourselves to offer more to society – and to make sure that our efforts are visible and valued.”

The ‘Game Plan’ report sets out the key areas where Rank believes reform is necessary, candidly stating why these reforms are commercially important and offering to “engage energetically and positively with those who might find fault with these reforms in the hope of creating an environment for a logical, rational and evidence-based debate on regulatory effectiveness.”

What is your opinion about this article?
  • I like it
    %
    0 votos
  • I don't like it
    %
    0 votos
  • I have not thought about it
    %
    0 votos
Leave your comment
Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe to receive the latest news and updates
Enter a valid email
Complete the captcha
Thank you for registering to our newsletter.
Follow us on Facebook